Tag Archives: fascism

Why We Can’t Elect Donald Trump (or any of the Bully Boys)

Donald Trump 2

Donald J Trump could become the leader of America, but if he is elected and if he does the things he says he will do, America will be a substantially different nation than it has always been. We can kiss our forefathers good-bye, and the high ideals they wished us to strive for as a nation. By the time we build that wall, send all undocumented immigrants back to their countries of origin, build up a huge military presence and bully China, I’m not sure what America will be left with, but I think we will finally understand the word Fascism.

Older Americans shudder at the thought of a Socialist taking over our Democracy but tend to have little or no reaction when someone exhibiting signs of Fascism (Donald Trump) begins to climb in the election polls. Fascism is far more at odds with Democracy than Socialism is but we just don’t have enough understanding of what the term means for it to call forth the intensely negative visceral reaction that it should. I have written warnings about this twice before, but this time I have help from a very famous writer, Umberto Eco.

Writing from Paris, Christopher Dickey begins his article in the Daily Beast with this statement, “Here in Europe, people know a thing or two about fascism.” He is remembering an article he read twenty years ago by the deeply philosophical Italian author Umberto Eco, who died last week.

No, here in Europe, by various names—as Fascism, Nazism, Stalinism—it was the living, vibrant, vicious force that led directly to the most horrific global war in history. More recently, it took root and lingered as an active ideology in Latin America, providing a crude foundation for the repressive revolutions and dirty wars that raged from the ’60s through the ’80s.

Indeed, the fundamentals of fascism are with us today, in the killing fields of ISIS-land, in the madness of North Korea, and also, sadly, in battered democracies from newly militaristic Japan to xenophobic, isolationist parties in Europe. And, yes, in somewhat more subtle forms fascism can be found on the campaign trail in the U.S. of A.

Umberto Eco, in his article (title not given) gives a list of the attributes of a Fascist:

Makes a cult of tradition

Rejects modernism

Takes action for action’s sake  (“thinking is a form of emasculation”)

Distrust of the intellectual world

Disagreement is treason

Racist by definition   (“seeks for consensus by exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference”)

The appeal to a frustrated middle class   (“a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups”)

Obsession with a plot

Followers must feel humiliated   (“by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies”)

Popular elitism   (“Every citizen belongs to the best people of the world, the members of the party are among the best citizens, every citizen can or ought to become a member of the party.”) (“[T]he leader knows that his force is based upon the weakness of the masses; they are so weak as to need and deserve a ruler”)

Life is permanent warfare  (“pacifism is trafficking with the enemy”)

Official heroism   (“martyrdom”)

Machismo   (“implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality”)

Selective populism   (“citizens do not act, they are only called on to play the role of the People”)

“Newspeak”   (from 1984, George Orwell)   (“All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.”)

Umberto Eco sounds like he is speaking about the Republican Party candidates and members of Congress, and especially of Donald Trump, as we know them right now, but he wrote this 20 years ago.

Here’s the link:


I think that all of the Republican candidates are unelectable and everyone is feeling this even if they will not admit it. I am guessing that people are thinking that Donald Trump is the least dogmatic. He is not toeing the party line. He is his own man. And for some reason people cannot see the dangers in turning over our governance to this man. They want the 50’s back and Donald promises the 50’s. But they will return under his terms. He humiliates anyone who questions his leadership and people back down, even scary people like Ted Cruz. If we give him carte blanche to “make America great again”, it will be his vision of America, not ours and he may have a hard time ever leaving office. He may make himself President-for-life. We cannot control this man. He brooks no disagreement. In the scary GOP line-up of future Presidents perhaps the man who seems most benign is the biggest nightmare of all, but we may not know it until it is too late.

At the end of his article Dickey draws parallels between Europe then and America now.

But where does Eco’s Eternal Fascism fit in American politics? Can it be that many of the figures parading before us in this presidential campaign year appeal to the worst instincts of “the People”? Do they play on atavistic fears and resentments, frustrations and humiliations? Are they marked by their irrationalism and anti-intellectualism, their hatred of things foreign, their desire to be seen as heroes and their gun-toting machismo?

Oh, hell yeah. But I don’t need to point the finger. Umberto Eco is doing it from the grave. As he wrote more than 20 year ago:

“Franklin Roosevelt’s words of November 4, 1938, are worth recalling: ‘If American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, fascism will grow in strength in our land.’

“Freedom and liberation,” Eco wrote, “are an unending task.”

How do we get angry Americans who think any of these guys are the answer to “setting America on the right path” to understand that they will do just the opposite? How do we get Donald Trump to leave the Republican race now that all of the non-scary candidates have been chased away? Getting rid of Donald is not enough. We must elect a Democrat in 2016 or American Democracy will not survive. I have no idea how we convince what I call “the pod people”, brainwashed by right wing media, that they must vote against the positions they have been taught to believe in.

10/27/15 On Megalomania, and the World https://draft.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=453069755357542576#editor/target=post;postID=2896814823017990171;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=0;src=postname

11/24/15 A Plague on Both Your Houses https://draft.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=453069755357542576#editor/target=post;postID=8679697109120850499;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=1;src=postname

By Nancy Brisson

A Plague on Both Your Houses?


People, and this includes some of my liberal friends, are always saying that the dysfunction in Washington right now can be laid at the feet of both parties. They believe that Democrats and Republicans are equally to blame for the partisanship and obstruction, for the enormous gap between the wealthy and the rest of us. And, of course, they are right, or in a way they are right. Money is far too important in Washington. It talks louder than we the people who can’t afford to make our voices heard because we cannot amass enough money to turn up the volume. We do need to deal with the outsized influences of special interests with lots of bucks, of Wall Street and the banks, and of big business.

However the Republicans have introduced another whole level of political drama that we must deal with first. Republicans have gone off the rails, off the deep end, delusional, and are aggressively pursuing reactionary policies that will hardly take America into a prosperous future. Democrats have been slow to counter the outrageous activities of the Republicans. Democrats have been shy, hanging back. They want to pretend that regular order still pertains in Washington. They are stodgy, self-conscious and do not want to match the operatic tone of the GOP (or the Biblical Old Testament tone either). That may be all to the good. Watching the full opera treatment play out in Washington might be too much for everyone.

However, we the people need to understand that, although our elected Congressmen in both parties are too involved with amassing personal wealth and a power base that will give them staying power and clout, the impasse we are presently in cannot be attributed equally to both parties. Both parties are not trying to rewrite the Constitution. Both parties are not trying to make it more difficult to vote. Both parties are not trying to overturn 50 year old court rulings that offered new hope to many beleaguered women. Both parties are not trying to privatize everything. And both parties are not trying to bring back a brand of Federalism that lost the debate the first time it was hotly contested in the 1780’s.

My point is that before we can deal with the greedy we need to deal with the nutty. This is what us lefties are trying to say to our families and our neighbors who support the GOP no matter how insane their actions.

There is a word that describes the things some Republicans have been saying and that word is fascism. I did not want to be the first person to use this politically and emotionally charged word in relation to the Republican candidates for the Presidency of our nation but last night on TV someone (sorry I don’t remember who) brought up this term which has not really been used much since Mussolini rose to power in Italy. Go over the definition carefully and see if it does or does not fit current circumstances. This definition was offered by Google.

noun: fascism; noun: Fascism; plural noun: Fascisms

  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More

Nazism, rightism;

nationalism, xenophobia, racism, anti-Semitism;

jingoism, isolationism;

neofascism, neo-Nazism

“a film depicting the rise of fascism in the 1930s”

  • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

So when we have people like Donald Trump saying that he will register all Muslims and keep certain mosques under surveillance and he will send any Syrian refugees that come to America straight back to Syria he is pandering to the xenophobia in us in order to get us to elect him. And his actions are fascist.

We also have the Republican candidates who would like to turn America into an Evangelical Christian theocracy. So when we hear Ted Cruz, this guy who supposedly channels our forefathers, say that we should accept only Christians from Syria we should hear a crowd behind him loudly whispering “fascist”, “fascist”, “fascist”, because what he is advocating is certainly not the Democracy our founders designed. But we don’t hear any great outcry. Our media bends over backwards to fairly represent the policies of both political parties. And Americans just keep watching FOX News, which barely qualifies as a news channel. (Stop watching FOX News!)

So let me say once again that in terms of setting priorities we need to get rid of the nuts in Washington before we can tackle the greed that is distorting our government. Both threaten our Democracy but the extremists have only recently taken over the top spot on that priority list (just since Obama took office). They seem able to say any old un-American thing and still maintain their popularity. This is why we need to elect a Democratic President in 2016. Sadly, the left may have entered the fray too late in the game. There is no way in which I accept the claim some people repeat again and again that both parties contribute equally to the recent dysfunction in Washington.

By Nancy Brisson

(graphic from time.com)