Category Archives: war on women

The GOP War on Women and Hillary Clinton

war on women2

We might not have needed Hillary Clinton if the Republicans had not spent the last seven years (at least) making women’s lives miserable. Women, no matter how men feel about it, have been under attack by the GOP and especially by Conservative Evangelicals.

We remember when Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke a slut because she wanted to continue to have access to birth control pills. BIRTH CONTROL PILLS! I’m surprised no one recommended that clitoral mutilation should perhaps be adopted as an American rite of passage. There was an implication that women should not get any pleasure from sexual relations. Representative Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) wanted women to be submissive to their husbands as a way to “fix America”. Women were blamed for the demise of the families which then led to the demise of the entire social order in the US. OMG – we went to work – and we liked it. It gave some of us a sense of purpose and sometimes prevented negative female problems like frustration, depression, etc. So the GOP told America that “liberated” women can be blamed for the holes in the fabric of the American Dream.

We might not have felt we had to insist on a female President except for the number of times Congress has tried to “defund” Planned Parenthood and threatened to shut down the US government in order to do it. We value Planned Parenthood. It has helped huge numbers of women at times when they needed safe, inexpensive, and confidential attention in their lives for a variety of reasons (and it still does). It sort of stands as a symbol of the freedoms women have won. I have a tough time understanding anyone who does not see that the GOP has been obsessed with women and issues that should only concern women, and perhaps their partners, ever since Obama took office. But none of this is Obama’s doing; he has no beef with women and vice versa.

Clearly the GOP does not intend to wait until numbers are on their side to overturn Roe v Wade and perhaps make some forms (or all forms) of birth control illegal. They can do this if they control all three branches of government and there will be almost nothing we can do to stop them. The Republicans have created such a threat against women that the only way we will feel safe from losing hard-won rights, granted by law and bolstered by scientific advances, rights that offer freedom to women, is to put a woman in the White House. One reason many women will support Hillary is because things look really grim for us if we don’t.

The GOP has spent seven years riling up all of the groups of Americans who are not white men or Evangelical women and now they act surprised that the only people in their tent are old white people, including white supremacists like David Duke and the KKK. The Republicans will reap what they sowed, we hope. The media, on the other hand, seems to have suddenly come down with collective amnesia. Hillary Clinton might rather just enjoy being a grandmother, but we can’t let her do that yet. So when the GOP starts in on Hillary, and they will, I hope that at least the women of America will remember what they stand to lose if we put a Republican in the White House.

War on Women – A Conversation

Most of this conversation took place in an exchange of emails:
TRIMBY:   (The Republican in my Back Yard ) (He is talking about the Larry Flynt attack on S.E. Cupp, a GBTV employee and a woman.)  Where is NOW?  Where is the media on this??  Of course if this was Hillary, Nancy or some other liberal woman, we would never hear the end of it…
TRIMBY:  “There is no war on women,” Glenn (Beck) said this morning, “at least from the Republican Party.”Earlier in the show, Glenn reported on the story of the union thugs who created a piñata of the face of South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley. “The war on women is coming from the left and it sickens me. Ann Romney, of course, has never worked a day in her life. The union piñata that is happening with Nikki Haley, the governor, it’s incredible,” Glenn said. The attack on Nikki Haley isn’t the worst attack on a conservative woman Glenn reported today. “One of our employees with GBTV, S.E. Cupp, has been so incredibly wronged. You would think this would be illegal, but it’s not,” Glenn told listeners this morning. The Blaze reported this morning that Hustler Magazine published a fake photo of S.E. Cupp in a sexual act with what appears to be a penis in her mouth. The pictures is published under the headline “Celebrity Fantasy,” and the text beside the picture asks, “What would S.E. Cupp look like and a [d**k] in her mouth?”Here is what Hustler had to say about S.E.: “S.E. Cupp is a lovely young lady who read too much Ayn Rand in high school and ended up joining the dark side. Cupp, an author and media commentator, who often shows up on Fox News programs, is undeniably cute. But her hotness is diminished when she espouses dumb ideas like defunding Planned Parenthood. Perhaps the method pictured here is Ms. Cupp’s suggestion for avoiding an unwanted pregnancy.”A disclaimer follows: “No such picture of S.E. Cupp actually exists. This composite fantasy is altered from the original for our imagination, does not depict reality, and is not to be taken seriously for any purpose.”Glenn noted that this is a complete falsehood, and despite the disclaimer on the photo, it will now be out there forever. This morning on radio S.E. joined Glenn on-air to discuss the disgusting attack.
ME:  This is what the GOP does lately. Any criticism leveled by Democrats is picked up by the Republicans and used in a slightly new way against Democrats, sort of an “I’m rubber, you’re glue, anything you say bounces off me and sticks to you.” You are citing personal attacks, one-on-one, and, you’re right that that attack you mention in this email, which I had not heard of, is quite trashy and disgusting. I don’t think the Democratic Party has anything to do with that attack. The original war on women was not personal, it was global, in this case meaning against a huge group of women who need health services that are inexpensive and confidential. Starting with Hilary Rosen’s unfortunate comments about Ann Romney, the Republicans have once again shifted this dialogue and made it refer to “mean” personal attacks, whether they were intended to be mean or not.
TRIMBY:  Uh… disagree.  First, trying to separate the direct supports of Democrats and Liberals is impossible.  There are some groups / individuals that are just synonymous with the Democratic party – NOW, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Green Movement, Peta, Lesbians, Gay Rights Organization, Unions, Planned Parenthood, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, Larry Flynt (although you may not aware of him), most of Hollywood, Michael Moore… The Republicans have a number of people on Talk Radio, Fox News, NRA, Tea Party (although they are seen as too conservative, libertarian for mainstream Republicans). To say it was directly the Democratic Party isn’t the point.  Not supporting abortion is not an attack on women – half the women in the country don’t believe in abortion.  The Democrats, in particular have a war on Religion if anything.  So you don’t consider on Mother’s Day, comparing a woman praise of motherhood to Stalin and Hitler offensive… but rather accidental?  Unfortunate?  Really??  How much more hate filled can the left get?  And it isn’t criticism of a policy… this are direct personal attacks on the women and their families…  your answer… it isn’t important, it is unfortunate, it isn’t the Democratic party… Wow… way to support other women… Funny too how you haven’t heard of it… can you image the response if someone did something like that Michele Obama?  Or perhaps Barbara Walters or some other liberal newscaster… Very disappointing comments from you, I figured you would be much more supportive of other women. 
ME: (This conversation has been “improved” but the intent was not changed.) In the abstract I do support women as a group, but in specific instances I do not support each act by any individual woman, since women do act independently sometimes. We are not clones. I cannot agree when a woman acting as a single person does something I don’t agree with. I think that meanness from the members of any political group is reprehensible and that hate talk is cheap and completely unnecessary. People may think they are being witty, but they are not. However, that said, you’re a man, but although you might argue on behalf of men as a gender, you certainly can’t back each man as an individual. You just listed about 20 men that you cannot give your support to.